đ You completely lost me... it's way too complicated. Your explanation was based on what you could see through your transparent paper, but not us... we had to imagine what you were talking about. A quantum leap, so to speak. Too bad because I really liked the idea of mastering perspective, but you really discouraged me this time. It's a bit like you were performing aerial acrobatics up there alone while I hadn't yet grown wings. I hope the rest of your explanations won't be the same...
Good evening Saint Jean, if you want to appreciate the perspective, you must understand it and go through learning it. You must circle around your object like a bird in flight. Think that your object is suspended in the air and you are an eagle going to seek the details to then draw it on a sheet of paper with the tip of a feather. You just need to be logical, know some laws and there you go. đđđ
Sorry to hear that this course caused you so much trouble! Were there particular parts that you found especially confusing, or were you unclear from the beginning? We don't really get bad feedback on this lesson as it is generally well understood, so your feedback will be useful to us, and we might be able to help you đ
For the first shape, your choice of viewing angle/elevation level is not the most suitable for understanding the shape, but it's very clear that you understand how it works ^^ well done.
Hello HadH, this viewpoint was chosen to push my difficulty and see if despite the foreground hiding the background, I could accurately execute the rear part and thus properly master the perspective from the angle I visualize in my head. It's funny to say that... now this course on perspective is opening up a lot of perspectives for me. đđ
I didn't understand at first that it was necessary to redraw the basic object according to the vanishing lines, and not identical to the model, which is seen flat, which I had done in the previous drawings. So, are the previous drawings wrong??
Indeed, your first 2 drawings were not correct, it was as if the perspective only applied to the edges of the figure haha.
But then your 2 new attempts are impeccable, nothing to say đ Well done for spotting your mistake ^^
It's almost right, but there's a little mix-upâtwo of your edges are vertical when they are supposed to be vanishing lines :) (the original shape needs to have oblique lines to achieve that effect). I've attached a little correction!
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 19
28/03/2021
Want to learn drawing?
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 1
02/04/2021
St-Jean
St-Jean
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 12
Nombre de réponse(s) : 132
04/04/2021
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 863
05/04/2021
Sorry to hear that this course caused you so much trouble! Were there particular parts that you found especially confusing, or were you unclear from the beginning? We don't really get bad feedback on this lesson as it is generally well understood, so your feedback will be useful to us, and we might be able to help you đ
NavrĂ©e que ce cours t'ai posĂ© autant problĂšme ! Y a t il des parties qui t'ont particuliĂšrement perdu ou Ă©tais tu dans le flou dĂšs le dĂ©but ? On a pas vraiment de mauvais retours sur cette leçon qui semble ĂȘtre bien comprise en gĂ©nĂ©ral donc tes retours nous seront utile, et on pourra peut-ĂȘtre t'aider đ
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 12
Nombre de réponse(s) : 132
04/04/2021
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 863
05/04/2021
For the first shape, your choice of viewing angle/elevation level is not the most suitable for understanding the shape, but it's very clear that you understand how it works ^^ well done.
Pour la premiÚre forme, ton choix d'angle de vue/niveau d'élévation n'est pas le plus adapté pour comprendre la forme mais on voit trÚs bien que tu as compris comment ça marche ^^ bien joué.
Try our courses for free
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 12
Nombre de réponse(s) : 132
06/04/2021
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 12
Nombre de réponse(s) : 132
04/04/2021
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 4
Nombre de réponse(s) : 26
07/04/2021
Here is the first object seen from below, I don't understand how to finish the drawing on the right, it doesn't line up with the vanishing point??
Voici le 1er objet vu de dessous, je ne comprends pas comment terminer le dessin sur la droite droite, ça ne colle pas avec le point de fuite ??
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 4
Nombre de réponse(s) : 26
07/04/2021
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 4
Nombre de réponse(s) : 26
09/04/2021
I didn't understand at first that it was necessary to redraw the basic object according to the vanishing lines, and not identical to the model, which is seen flat, which I had done in the previous drawings. So, are the previous drawings wrong??
Here are the new versions
je n'ai pas compris de suite qu'il fallait redessiner l'objet de base suivant les fuyantes, et non pas Ă l'identique du modĂšle qui est vu Ă plat, ce que jâavais fait dans les dessins prĂ©cĂ©dents . Du coup est- ce que les dessins prĂ©cĂ©dents sont faux??
Voici les nouvelles versions
Want to learn drawing?
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 863
09/04/2021
Indeed, your first 2 drawings were not correct, it was as if the perspective only applied to the edges of the figure haha.
But then your 2 new attempts are impeccable, nothing to say đ Well done for spotting your mistake ^^
En effet tes 2 premiers dessins ne sont pas corrects, c'était comme si la perspective ne s'appliquait que sur les bords de la figure haha.
Mais du coup tes 2 nouveaux essais sont impeccables, rien Ă dire đ Bravo d'avoir repĂ©rĂ© ton erreur ^^
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 4
Nombre de réponse(s) : 26
09/04/2021
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 4
Nombre de réponse(s) : 26
10/04/2021
thank you for your response đ
merci de ta reponse đ
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 2
Nombre de réponse(s) : 100
11/04/2021
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 863
18/04/2021
It's almost right, but there's a little mix-upâtwo of your edges are vertical when they are supposed to be vanishing lines :) (the original shape needs to have oblique lines to achieve that effect). I've attached a little correction!
C'est presque ça mais il y a eu une petite embrouille, 2 de tes arĂȘtes se retrouvent verticales alors que ce sont sensĂ©es ĂȘtre des fuyantes :) (il faudrait que la forme originale ait des obliques pour avoir un rĂ©sultat comme ça). Je te joins une petite correction !
Try our courses for free
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 2
Nombre de réponse(s) : 100
18/04/2021