Hello đ
Here is my toolbox in 3D.
The further I progressed with the drawings, the more I felt that the lines were becoming less and less clean đ... (and the parallel lines were becoming less and less parallel). I must say that after the kitchen appliance and the car, tackling the toolbox is quite a challenge, and you're inspiring me đđ!
Enough joking around, this is a great exercise. Representing it in 3D requires a lot of concentration, and it's really making me work hard đ.
Looking forward to your comments!
After reviewing the corrections, I realize that I'm still being overly meticulous with the details, and I'm wasting a lot of time at the expense of the essential elements. I'm focusing on the overall composition and putting the details aside; I've understood the principle of the exercise!
Indeed, itâs very detailed, Phila, and very neat ^^
Your lines donât necessarily need to be perfectly straight, you know. Thereâs an artist I really like (Nesskain) who draws everything freehand. But you canât even tell on his backgrounds. As he says himself, if nothing is perfectly straight and you have slight variations all over, slight âmistakes,â the eye wonât really notice them. Whereas if you make a mistake or draw a line that isnât properly aligned in a clean, straight drawing, it will immediately stand out. And personally, I prefer this approach for backgrounds and objects. But itâs a matter of taste ^^ Some people prefer straight, clean lines; in my case, as long as everything works well and correctly, thatâs enough for me :3
Indeed, these are the most challenging exercises ^^ You have to understand them in order to do things correctly.
Regarding your exercise, be careful, it seems you have changed some elements between the 2D and 3D views. For example, in 2D, your box is roughly a rectangle. In 3D, it looks like you chose to tilt the front face. In another view, you added a rim above the closures of the box, whereas from the front, we can clearly see that the closures extend all the way to the top face of the box. So, be careful, all the characteristics must be the same everywhere.
Here is my toolbox... I had to start with the ruler because I was struggling (and yet I do technical drawing as part of my job ^^).
But in the end, I managed to do without it for the second view đ
Simple and effective, Charlie! Just be careful with the proportions, as your box seems to widen considerably in this bottom view. Also, the edge behind the box handle is missing in this view (it creates a kind of mini-stair, with the back higher than the front). You did a good job with the front step, but not with the back one.
Pay attention to maintaining consistency across all your views. For example, the handle of the box: in the top view, the handle is included within the volume of the box, but in the front view, it protrudes on both sides. This is an inconsistency. Also, it seems you havenât quite grasped what the top of the box looks like. I think you should rework it a bit.
Here are my first attempts at designing the toolbox. Apart from the fact that Iâm having trouble getting the proportions right, I think Iâve understood the (3D) shapes of the object pretty well. Iâm ready to start working on it for a home improvement store :p
Bonjour Ă tous.
Voici mes premiers essais pour la caisse Ă outils. A part le fait que j'ai du mal Ă respecter les proportions, je pense avoir bien compris les formes (3D) de l'objet. Je suis fin prĂȘt Ă bosser Ă casto :p
Youâre not doing so badly with the proportions, all things considered ^^ Apart from the front view, which is too high, and the top view, which is a little too long, youâre relatively consistent.
And youâve clearly understood the volume, so I approve ^^
Hello snakecroqueur o/
Tu n'es pas si mal sur les proportions non plus mine de rien ^^ Hormis la vue de face qui est trop haute, et celle de dessus un poil trop longue, tu es relativement homogĂšne.
Et tu as bien compris le volume, donc je valide ^^
Hello everyone,
Iâm sharing my toolbox, which Iâve simplified quite a bit, and which is missing quite a few details.
And my camera, which gave me a lot of trouble with its wires and the very complicated details that are hard to reproduce. I also had some difficulty with the other perspectives of this object because we could barely see the other sides of the camera.
However, I think Iâve understood the negative points in my drawing and what I need to improve in the future.
Goodbye.
It still needs more observation and understanding of the volumes. For example, on your toolbox, I can see that you havenât understood the top part. And there are inconsistencies between your two views. In the 3D view, you show me that the handle is attached to the top, in line with the edges of the box. In the top view, the handle is really towards the inside, and thereâs a margin between it and the edges of the box. We see the same kind of issue with the camera; it feels like you donât quite understand how the elements are arranged in relation to each other. What is attached to what and where. So, it needs to be reworked. Observe carefully, donât hesitate to start with simple geometric shapes. Take the time to understand your model well, try to be logical. If an element is placed in a certain place, then if I rotate it, where will it be? etc.
Itâs not bad, but there are some inconsistencies between your two views. In the one on the left, you show me that on the lid, you have a higher section with space on the right and left for the box handle (which is correct). In the version on the right, I can see the space on the right, but not on the left. The handle protrudes outward, so there is no space left.
For the rest, you have understood well how the box is structured; the construction is still a bit flawed, and the perspective you see later in the tutorial could be improved.
Donât hesitate to start by building with simple geometric shapes and in transparency (as if your object were transparent and you could see the hidden parts); this helps to align things and achieve symmetry, etc.
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 18
10/06/2020
Here is my toolbox in 3D.
The further I progressed with the drawings, the more I felt that the lines were becoming less and less clean đ... (and the parallel lines were becoming less and less parallel). I must say that after the kitchen appliance and the car, tackling the toolbox is quite a challenge, and you're inspiring me đđ!
Enough joking around, this is a great exercise. Representing it in 3D requires a lot of concentration, and it's really making me work hard đ.
Looking forward to your comments!
After reviewing the corrections, I realize that I'm still being overly meticulous with the details, and I'm wasting a lot of time at the expense of the essential elements. I'm focusing on the overall composition and putting the details aside; I've understood the principle of the exercise!
Voici donc ma caisse Ă outils en volume.
Plus j'avançais dans les reprĂ©sentations, et plus je sentais que le trait Ă©tait de moins en moins clean đ ... (et les parallĂšles de moins en moins parallĂšles). Il faut dire qu'aprĂšs le robot mĂ©nager et la voiture, on attaque la caisse Ă outils, vous me faĂźtes rĂȘver đđ!
TrĂȘve de plaisanterie, c'est un super exo. La reprĂ©sentation dans l'espace me demande beaucoup de concentration, ça me fait bien bosser đ
A vos commentaires !
AprÚs coup, en revoyant la correction, je me rends compte que je fais encore du zÚle dans les détails, et je perds beaucoup de temps au détriment de l'essentiel. J'attaque la caméra en mettant de cÎté les détails, j'ai bien compris le principe de l'exo !
Want to learn drawing?
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
12/07/2020
Your lines donât necessarily need to be perfectly straight, you know. Thereâs an artist I really like (Nesskain) who draws everything freehand. But you canât even tell on his backgrounds. As he says himself, if nothing is perfectly straight and you have slight variations all over, slight âmistakes,â the eye wonât really notice them. Whereas if you make a mistake or draw a line that isnât properly aligned in a clean, straight drawing, it will immediately stand out. And personally, I prefer this approach for backgrounds and objects. But itâs a matter of taste ^^ Some people prefer straight, clean lines; in my case, as long as everything works well and correctly, thatâs enough for me :3
Tes traits n'ont pas nĂ©cessairement besoin d'ĂȘtre parfaitement droit tu sais. Il y a un artiste que j'aime beaucoup (Nesskain), qui trace tout Ă main levĂ©e. Mais ça ne se voit pas du tout sur ses dĂ©cors. Comme il le dit lui-mĂȘme, si rien n'est parfaitement droit et que tu as de lĂ©gĂšres variations un peu partout, de lĂ©gĂšres "erreurs", l'oeil ne les verra plus vraiment. Alors que si tu fais une erreur ou un trait pas bien alignĂ© dans un dessin bien propre et rectiligne, ça va sauter aux yeux directement. Et personnellement, je prĂ©fĂšre cette maniĂšre d'apprĂ©hender les choses pour les dĂ©cors et les objets. Mais c'est une affaire de goĂ»t ^^ D'autres prĂ©fĂšrent les lignes bien droites et propres, dans mon cas, du moment que tout fonctionne bien et correctement, ça me suffit :3
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 15
11/06/2020
I agree with Philaâs comment; these topics are simply amazing.
Je plussoie au commentaire de Phila, rien que du rĂȘve ces sujets
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 15
11/06/2020
Overall, itâs a very interesting exercise that requires you to really rack your brains to visualize the toolbox from all angles.
Au final exercice trÚs intéressant qui demande à se triturer les méninges pour visualiser la boßte à outil sous tous ses angles
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
12/07/2020
Indeed, these are the most challenging exercises ^^ You have to understand them in order to do things correctly.
Regarding your exercise, be careful, it seems you have changed some elements between the 2D and 3D views. For example, in 2D, your box is roughly a rectangle. In 3D, it looks like you chose to tilt the front face. In another view, you added a rim above the closures of the box, whereas from the front, we can clearly see that the closures extend all the way to the top face of the box. So, be careful, all the characteristics must be the same everywhere.
En effet, ce sont les exercices les plus stimulants ^^ Obligé de comprendre pour pouvoir faire correctement les choses.
Pour ton exercice, attention, j'ai l'impression que tu as changĂ© des Ă©lĂ©ments entre les vues 2D et les vues 3D. Par exemple, en 2D, ta boite est un rectangle grosso modo. En 3D, on dirait que tu as choisi d'incliner la face avant. Sur une autre vue, tu as mis un rebord au-dessus des fermetures de la boite, alors que de face, on voit bien que les fermetures montent jusqu'Ă la face supĂ©rieure de la boite. Donc attention, je dois avoir les mĂȘmes caractĂ©ristiques partout.
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 8
19/06/2020
Here is my toolbox... I had to start with the ruler because I was struggling (and yet I do technical drawing as part of my job ^^).
But in the end, I managed to do without it for the second view đ
Voici ma boite à outils... J'ai dû démarrer à la rÚgle car je m'en sortais pas (je fais du dessin technique dans mon job pourtant ^^)
Mais bon j'ai rĂ©ussi Ă m'en affranchir pour la seconde vue đ
Try our courses for free
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
12/07/2020
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 13
22/06/2020
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
12/07/2020
Pay attention to maintaining consistency across all your views. For example, the handle of the box: in the top view, the handle is included within the volume of the box, but in the front view, it protrudes on both sides. This is an inconsistency. Also, it seems you havenât quite grasped what the top of the box looks like. I think you should rework it a bit.
Attention Ă rester cohĂ©rent sur toutes tes vues. Par exemple, la poignĂ©e de la boite, sur la vue de dessus, cette poignĂ©e est inclue dans le volume de ta boite, mais de face, elle dĂ©borde de part et d'autre. C'est une incohĂ©rence. De mĂȘme, tu sembles n'avoir pas compris Ă quoi ressemble le dessus de la boite. A retravailler un peu je pense ^^
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 13
22/06/2020
Here are my first attempts at designing the toolbox. Apart from the fact that Iâm having trouble getting the proportions right, I think Iâve understood the (3D) shapes of the object pretty well. Iâm ready to start working on it for a home improvement store :p
Voici mes premiers essais pour la caisse Ă outils. A part le fait que j'ai du mal Ă respecter les proportions, je pense avoir bien compris les formes (3D) de l'objet. Je suis fin prĂȘt Ă bosser Ă casto :p
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
12/07/2020
Youâre not doing so badly with the proportions, all things considered ^^ Apart from the front view, which is too high, and the top view, which is a little too long, youâre relatively consistent.
And youâve clearly understood the volume, so I approve ^^
Tu n'es pas si mal sur les proportions non plus mine de rien ^^ Hormis la vue de face qui est trop haute, et celle de dessus un poil trop longue, tu es relativement homogĂšne.
Et tu as bien compris le volume, donc je valide ^^
Want to learn drawing?
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 13
18/07/2020
Thatâs encouraging.
C'est encourageant.
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 38
29/06/2020
Here is the toolbox. I tried not to include too many details, but it can still be tricky at times.
Feel free to share any comments you have.
Voici la caisse à outils. J'ai essayé de ne pas mettre trop de détails mais cela reste parfois délicat.
N'hésitez pas si vous avez une remarque.
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
12/07/2020
This toolbox is cute! It looks a bit like a toolbox for children, with its rounded shape and large components. I personally like it ^^
I approve, youâve clearly understood how itâs designed :)
Elle est mignonne cette caisse à outils ! On dirait un peu une caisse à outils pour enfants, tout en rondeurs, avec des gros éléments. J'aime bien perso ^^
Je valide, tu as bien compris comment elle est fichue :)
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 11
07/07/2020
Iâm sharing my toolbox, which Iâve simplified quite a bit, and which is missing quite a few details.
And my camera, which gave me a lot of trouble with its wires and the very complicated details that are hard to reproduce. I also had some difficulty with the other perspectives of this object because we could barely see the other sides of the camera.
However, I think Iâve understood the negative points in my drawing and what I need to improve in the future.
Goodbye.
je vous partage ma caisse a outils , que j'ai beaucoup simplifier et oĂč il manque pas mal de dĂ©tails .
Et ma camera qui ma donner du fils a retordre avec ses fils et ses détails trÚs compliqué a reproduire . J'ai également eu du mal avec les autres point de vue de cet objet car on ne voyait que trÚs peu les autres faces de la caméra.
Cependant , je pense avoir compris les points négatifs dans mon dessin et ce qu'il me faudra améliorer a l'avenir
au revoir
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
12/07/2020
It still needs more observation and understanding of the volumes. For example, on your toolbox, I can see that you havenât understood the top part. And there are inconsistencies between your two views. In the 3D view, you show me that the handle is attached to the top, in line with the edges of the box. In the top view, the handle is really towards the inside, and thereâs a margin between it and the edges of the box. We see the same kind of issue with the camera; it feels like you donât quite understand how the elements are arranged in relation to each other. What is attached to what and where. So, it needs to be reworked. Observe carefully, donât hesitate to start with simple geometric shapes. Take the time to understand your model well, try to be logical. If an element is placed in a certain place, then if I rotate it, where will it be? etc.
Ăa manque encore d'observation et de comprĂ©hension des volumes tout ça. Par exemple, sur ta caisse Ă outils, je vois que tu n'as pas compris le dessus. Et tu as des incohĂ©rences entre tes deux vues. Sur celle en 3D, tu me montres que la poignĂ©e se fixe sur le dessus, Ă l'aplomb des bords de la boite. Celle de dessus, la poignĂ©e est vraiment vers l'intĂ©rieur, et il y a une marge avec les bords de la boite. On retrouve le mĂȘme genre de souci sur la camĂ©ra, on sent que tu ne comprends pas trop comment les Ă©lĂ©ments sont agencĂ©s les uns par rapport aux autres. Qu'est-ce qui est fixĂ© Ă quoi et oĂč. Donc Ă retravailler, observe bien, n'hĂ©site pas Ă commencer par des formes gĂ©omĂ©triques simples. Prends le temps de bien comprendre ton modĂšle, essaie d'ĂȘtre logique, si un Ă©lĂ©ment est placĂ© Ă tel endroit, alors si je tourne, je le retrouve oĂč ? etc.
Try our courses for free
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 45
09/07/2020
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
12/07/2020
There are a few minor inconsistencies (regarding how the handle is attached to the lid). But overall, you understood it well.
I approve. đ
Il y a des petites incohérences (au niveau de la fixation de la poignée sur le couvercle). Mais tu as bien compris globalement ^^
Je valide đ
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 10
30/07/2020
I had a lot of trouble with the toolbox. Here it is. Thank you in advance for your advice.
J ai beaucoup galéré sur la boite a outils.la voici.merci par avance pour vos conseils.
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
22/08/2020
Itâs not bad, but there are some inconsistencies between your two views. In the one on the left, you show me that on the lid, you have a higher section with space on the right and left for the box handle (which is correct). In the version on the right, I can see the space on the right, but not on the left. The handle protrudes outward, so there is no space left.
For the rest, you have understood well how the box is structured; the construction is still a bit flawed, and the perspective you see later in the tutorial could be improved.
Donât hesitate to start by building with simple geometric shapes and in transparency (as if your object were transparent and you could see the hidden parts); this helps to align things and achieve symmetry, etc.
C'est pas mal, mais tu as des incohérences entre tes deux vues. Sur celle à gauche, tu me montres que sur le couvercle, tu as une partie plus élevée avec un espace à droite et à gauche pour la poignée de la caisse (ce qui est juste). Sur la version à droite, j'ai bien cet espace à droite, mais pas à gauche. La poignée déborde à l'extérieur, il n'y a plus d'espace.
Pour le reste, tu as bien compris comment Ă©tait fichue la boite, c'est la construction qui pĂȘche encore un peu, et la perspective que tu vois un peu plus tard dans la formation ^^
N'hésite pas à construire avec des formes géométriques simples au début et en transparence (comme si ton objet était transparent et que tu voyais les parties cachées), ça aide à aligner les choses, à avoir de la symétrie etc ^^