Here is my work, I think I'm starting to get used to the exercise and to have managed better than with the cash register!
I would really like to have feedback on what is good or not, thank you! đ
It's not bad at all, there are some little inconsistencies in the proportions (the width and length of the lens cylinder vary and the front cover is too flattened in width) and elements that disappear (thing for the eye in the views on the right), but apart from that, the elements are well placed and it's pretty consistent :) Well done!
Here is my 2D sketchboard. It's still pretty shaky, but I'm getting more confident with my lines (especially straight ones). I think I've grasped the breakdown of this camera :)
Overall, these 2D views are quite good! The elements are well placed and coherent. The only issue I see (and it's not a small one) is a pretty severe problem with the proportions of the main volumes: the relationship between the lens cylinder, the front cover, and the body is not consistent. It's about right in the first one at the top left, then to the right, the body shortens and it gets worse in the top view where the lens cylinder appears huge. The cover seems wider when it should be the same width.
The front and rear views are OK even though the eyepiece poses a problem (it should end much higher if we go by your side views).
Les vues face et derriĂšres sont OK mĂȘme si l'embout pour mettre l'oeil pose souci (notamment il devrait arriver bien plus haut si on se fie Ă tes vues profil)
Nice work, it is well understood :) On the profile view the microphone is a bit small. Be careful, the handle should be positioned in the middle of the camera body, not on the side, which results in a mistake in your various views. This leads you to not have attached the camera to the handle in your top view. Otherwise, your 2D views are good. For your 3D view it's good too :) However, there is still the issue with the handle not being in the middle, and the cylinder is not well-rounded. It should be based on a circle that would fit right in the middle of the camera on which it is. I'm attaching a tutorial for cylinders ^^
Great job, we've got a lot of views! The perspectives are mostly successful, well done! Be careful, the handle of the camera should be in the middle of the camera body and not on the side as in some views. Also, this handle is often drawn flat against the body of the camera, but it would not be possible to grasp it like that. You did it well in your view on the right at mid-height since it has the correct hole. On the bottom right it's good, but the body should be a bit wider. I also notice that you often made the camera lens cylinder into a parallelepiped. It can be useful for positioning but ultimately it's a cylinder on this camera.
In any case, you have understood the exercise well, bravo :)
The image is not visible. To add an image, make sure to click on "choose a file" under "Attach an image" and ensure that the image is less than 2 MB.
Bonjour cathoumarcel !
L'image n'est pas visible. Pour mettre une image, il faut bien cliquer sur "choisir un fichier" sous "Joindre une image" et faire attention Ă ce que l'image pĂšse moins de 2 mo.
That's pretty well understood! Just be careful, the handle to hold the camera is located in the middle of the camera body, not on the side like you did in your top view. As for the perspective view, it's good! What I notice is that the small screen on the camera should not be tilted; it is at the same angle as the body of the camera. Regarding the cylinder at the front of the camera (the lens), it's good, but it doesn't start from the middle of the camera. I'll show you a little tutorial on cylinders. In your case, the circles would be smaller in the square (because the cylinder doesn't take up the whole surface of the front of the camera) but still centered like that. Don't hesitate to ask questions if you don't understand. Good job anyway, keep it up ;)
Great job on this neat work, well done :) You have a good understanding of this camera, just be mindful of the size ratios that you tend to vary a bit between the views. For instance, in the top left view from above, the camera body is a bit short; it should be more like what you did in your bottom view. Similarly in the bottom right where the body is too cubic rather than slightly elongated. Otherwise, the various elements seem well placed, and the perspectives are successful. For the first perspective (middle right at height) the front of the lens seems too turned towards us compared to the rest of the camera, which seems slightly more from the side. In any case, itâs good work that I approve :)
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 28
19/11/2020
Want to learn drawing?
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 29
22/11/2020
Here is my work, I think I'm starting to get used to the exercise and to have managed better than with the cash register!
I would really like to have feedback on what is good or not, thank you! đ
voici mon travail je pense que je commence a m'habituĂ© a l'exercice et de m'ĂȘtres mieux dĂ©brouiller qu'avec la caisse !
voila j'aimerais beaucoup avoir un avis dessus sur ce qui et bon ou non merci ! đ
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 863
23/11/2020
Indeed, it's a bit better than the toolbox :)
Apart from the microphone which is too forward and too small, your side view is good!
In the 3D view, it's mostly small inaccuracies, nothing too bad.
In your bottom view, there are some small proportion issues (case too short, cover a bit thick) but overall it's successful ^^ Well done!! âïž
C'est en effet un peu mieux que la boĂźte Ă outils :)
A part le micro qui est trop en avant et trop petit, ta vue de profil est bien !
Sur la vue 3D, c'est surtout des petites imprécisions, rien de trop bien méchant.
Sur ta vue du dessous, il y a des petits soucis de proportions (boĂźtier trop court, cache un peu Ă©pais) mais globalement c'est rĂ©ussi ^^ Bien jouĂ© !! âïž
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 12
27/11/2020
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 863
28/11/2020
It's not bad at all, there are some little inconsistencies in the proportions (the width and length of the lens cylinder vary and the front cover is too flattened in width) and elements that disappear (thing for the eye in the views on the right), but apart from that, the elements are well placed and it's pretty consistent :) Well done!
Ce n'est pas mal du tout, il y a des petites incohérences dans les proportions (la largeur et la longueur du cylindre de l'objectif varie et la cache à l'avant est trop aplati en largeur) et des éléments qui disparaissent (machin pour l'oeil dans les vues à droite), mais en dehors de ça, les éléments sont bien placés et c'est plutÎt cohérent :) Bien joué !
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 17
28/11/2020
Here is my 2D sketchboard. It's still pretty shaky, but I'm getting more confident with my lines (especially straight ones). I think I've grasped the breakdown of this camera :)
I'm moving on to its 3D realization ;)
Have a great evening!
Voici ma planche à croquis 2D. C'est toujours assez bancal mais je prends de l'assurance dans mes traits (surtout rectiligne). Je pense avoir saisi la décomposition de cette caméra :)
Je m'attaque à sa réalisation en volume ;)
Bonne soirée!
Try our courses for free
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 863
28/11/2020
Overall, these 2D views are quite good! The elements are well placed and coherent. The only issue I see (and it's not a small one) is a pretty severe problem with the proportions of the main volumes: the relationship between the lens cylinder, the front cover, and the body is not consistent. It's about right in the first one at the top left, then to the right, the body shortens and it gets worse in the top view where the lens cylinder appears huge. The cover seems wider when it should be the same width.
The front and rear views are OK even though the eyepiece poses a problem (it should end much higher if we go by your side views).
Good luck with the volumetric view(s)!
Ces vues 2D sont bien globalement ! Les Ă©lĂ©ments sont bien placĂ©s et cohĂ©rents. Le seul souci que je vois (mais pas des moindres), c'est un problĂšme de proportion assez sĂ©vĂšre au niveau des volumes principaux : le rapport entre le cyclindre de l'objectif, le cache Ă l'avant et le boĂźtier n'est pas consistant. C'est Ă peu prĂšs ça sur la premiĂšre en haut Ă gauche, puis Ă droite le boĂźtier raccourcit et ça s'empire sur la vue de dessus ou oĂč le cylindre de l'objectif paraĂźt Ă©norme. Le cache paraĂźt plus large alors qu'il devrait faire la mĂȘme largeur.
Les vues face et derriĂšres sont OK mĂȘme si l'embout pour mettre l'oeil pose souci (notamment il devrait arriver bien plus haut si on se fie Ă tes vues profil)
Bon courage pour la/les vue(s) en volume !
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 17
29/11/2020
I will try to correct the course for the perspective views :)
Je vais tenter de corriger le tir pour les vues en perspective :)
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 17
11/12/2020
This is all I can offer for now :) but I fully intend to conquer it!
Je ne peux proposer que cela pour l'instant :) mais compte bien en venir Ă bout!
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 19
06/12/2020
here is the camera exercise, I had a lot of difficulty doing it.
voilà pour l'exercice de la caméra, j'ai eu beaucoup de difficulté à le réaliser.
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 1726
11/12/2020
Nice work, it is well understood :) On the profile view the microphone is a bit small. Be careful, the handle should be positioned in the middle of the camera body, not on the side, which results in a mistake in your various views. This leads you to not have attached the camera to the handle in your top view. Otherwise, your 2D views are good. For your 3D view it's good too :) However, there is still the issue with the handle not being in the middle, and the cylinder is not well-rounded. It should be based on a circle that would fit right in the middle of the camera on which it is. I'm attaching a tutorial for cylinders ^^
Joli travail, c'est bien compris :) Sur la vue de profil le micro est un peu petit. Attention la anse se positionne au milieu du corps de la caméra, pas sur le cÎté, ce qui fait une erreur sur tes différentes vues. ça te mÚne à ne pas avoir accroché la caméra à la anse sur ta vue de dessus. Sinon, tes vues 2D sont bien. Pour ta vue 3D c'est bien :) Par contre il y a toujours le souci de la anse pas au milieu, et le cylindre n'est pas bien arrondi. Il se base à partir d'un cercle qui s'inscrirait bien au milieu de la ce la caméra sur laquelle il est. Je te joins un tuto pour les cylindres ^^
Want to learn drawing?
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 8
11/12/2020
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 1726
23/12/2020
Great job, we've got a lot of views! The perspectives are mostly successful, well done! Be careful, the handle of the camera should be in the middle of the camera body and not on the side as in some views. Also, this handle is often drawn flat against the body of the camera, but it would not be possible to grasp it like that. You did it well in your view on the right at mid-height since it has the correct hole. On the bottom right it's good, but the body should be a bit wider. I also notice that you often made the camera lens cylinder into a parallelepiped. It can be useful for positioning but ultimately it's a cylinder on this camera.
In any case, you have understood the exercise well, bravo :)
C'est du beau travail, on a plein de vues ! Les perspectives sont globalement rĂ©ussies, bien jouĂ© ! Attention, la anse de la camĂ©ra devrait ĂȘtre au milieu du corps de la camĂ©ra et non sur le cĂŽtĂ© comme dans certaines vues. Aussi, cette anse est souvent dessinĂ©e aplatie sur le corps de la camĂ©ra, mais on ne pourrait pas la prendre comme ça. Tu l'as bien faite sur ta vue Ă droite au milieu (niveau hauteur) vue qu'elle a bien son trou. En bas Ă droite c'est bien, mais le corps devrait ĂȘtre un peu plus large. Je remarque aussi que tu as souvent fait le cylindre de l'objectif de la camĂ©ra en parallĂ©lĂ©pipĂšde. ça peut ĂȘtre utile pour positionner mais au final c'est bien un cylindre sur cette camĂ©ra.
En tous cas tu as bien compris l'exercice, bravo :)
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 5
20/12/2020
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 1726
29/12/2020
The image is not visible. To add an image, make sure to click on "choose a file" under "Attach an image" and ensure that the image is less than 2 MB.
L'image n'est pas visible. Pour mettre une image, il faut bien cliquer sur "choisir un fichier" sous "Joindre une image" et faire attention Ă ce que l'image pĂšse moins de 2 mo.
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 9
Nombre de réponse(s) : 23
21/12/2020
Here are the different camera plans....
Ici les différents plan de la caméra....
Try our courses for free
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 1726
29/12/2020
That's pretty well understood! Just be careful, the handle to hold the camera is located in the middle of the camera body, not on the side like you did in your top view. As for the perspective view, it's good! What I notice is that the small screen on the camera should not be tilted; it is at the same angle as the body of the camera. Regarding the cylinder at the front of the camera (the lens), it's good, but it doesn't start from the middle of the camera. I'll show you a little tutorial on cylinders. In your case, the circles would be smaller in the square (because the cylinder doesn't take up the whole surface of the front of the camera) but still centered like that. Don't hesitate to ask questions if you don't understand. Good job anyway, keep it up ;)
C'est plutĂŽt bien compris tout ça ! Attention la anse pour tenir la camĂ©ra est situĂ©e au milieu du corps de la camĂ©ra, pas sur le cĂŽtĂ© comme tu l'as fait sur ta vue de dessus. Pour ce qui est de la vue en perspective, c'est bien ! Ce que je remarque est que le petit Ă©cran de la camĂ©ra ne devrait pas ĂȘtre penchĂ©, il est dans le mĂȘme angle que le corps de la camĂ©ra. Pour ce qui est du cylindre Ă l'avant de la camĂ©ra (l'objectif), c'est bien mais il ne part pas du milieu de la camĂ©ra, je te montre un petit tutoriel sur les cylindres. Dans ton cas les ronds seraient plus petits dans le carrĂ© (car le cylindre ne prend pas toute la surface de l'avant de la camĂ©ra) mais toujours au centre comme ça. N'hĂ©site pas Ă poser des questions si tu ne comprends pas. Bon travail en tous cas, continue ;)
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 9
Nombre de réponse(s) : 23
21/12/2020
Thank you for the correction.
Merci pour la correction.
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 63
22/12/2020
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 1726
29/12/2020
Great job on this neat work, well done :) You have a good understanding of this camera, just be mindful of the size ratios that you tend to vary a bit between the views. For instance, in the top left view from above, the camera body is a bit short; it should be more like what you did in your bottom view. Similarly in the bottom right where the body is too cubic rather than slightly elongated. Otherwise, the various elements seem well placed, and the perspectives are successful. For the first perspective (middle right at height) the front of the lens seems too turned towards us compared to the rest of the camera, which seems slightly more from the side. In any case, itâs good work that I approve :)
C'est du beau travail soignĂ©, bravo :) Tu as bien compris cette camĂ©ra, attention juste aux rapports de taille que tu as tendance Ă varier un peu entre les vues. Par exemple pour la camĂ©ra de dessus en haut Ă gauche, le corps de la camĂ©ra est un peu court, ça devrait ĂȘtre plus comme ce que tu as fait pour ta vue de dessous. Pareil en bas Ă droite oĂč le corps est un peu trop cubique plutĂŽt qu'un peu allongĂ©. Sinon les diffĂ©rents Ă©lĂ©ments semblent bien placĂ©s, les perspectives rĂ©ussies. Pour la premiĂšre perspective (Ă droite au milieu niveau hauteur) L'avant de l'objectif semble trop tournĂ© vers nous par rapport au reste de la camĂ©ra qui semble lĂ©gĂšrement plus de profil. En tous cas c'est du bon travail que je valide :)
You must be logged in to reply on the forum.