The composition is cool, your elements are well constructed, it tells a little story too. You've even placed your elements according to different vanishing points and it works very well.
Where you could improve things is in terms of the gray values.
If we look at your image from a distance, everything is a bit uniform. You don't really have plans that stand out. If I were you, I'd try darkening the background building and a bit the tops of the tanks on the right.
Hello! đ
Here's my little illustration.
I like my composition even though I think it's full of mistakes! đ
I'm open to any criticism because I really want to improve!
A big thank you for these well-structured courses, they have helped me think more when I draw.
I think I've learned more in a few weeks than in all these years of drawing!
Honestly, it works well :D You have made good use of the different concepts we covered in class.
My only slight criticism would be regarding the clouds which are all of similar size and very close to the horizon. It kind of stifles your composition :)
Your characters might be a tad too large, but it's not jarring ^^
Hello!
Thank you for the positive response! I'm looking forward to seeing the character classes to better stage them.
It's true that I didn't think enough about the clouds. I just thought about the guidelines rather than their place in the image.
But having managed to use the concepts seen in the course allows me to appreciate my illustration even though it's still far from the result I really want.
Here's my illustration, trying to follow the advice given in the courses so far.
I feel like I still have a lot of progress to make, but I already feel like my drawings have improved a lot since I started taking your courses.
I would really appreciate your critical feedback, it would help me a lot đ
There are good things, and others that we could improve.
You chose a sci-fi theme, and you tell us a little story, that's cool.
I clearly understood that a shuttle was crashing, even though I don't understand on what. Some kind of circular structure, we see another one in the background. And I clearly see the shuttle first, I think that's where you wanted to direct my gaze. You handled the levels of gray and the values of the lines well.
Things we can improve:
> the famous circular structure: I don't understand what it is and compared to the other one we see very far on the horizon, it seems thinner. It's not the same object. And I have a hard time understanding its volume.
> The foreground: It feels like it's the top of a store? I'm not sure. In any case, it takes up as much space in your image as your crashing spaceship. It's a pity because it doesn't contribute anything to your illustration. If it were more offset to one side, it would be more striking and your image would breathe more.
> You have a graphical knot in your image, which tends to attract attention and disrupt the reading: the upper edge of the building in the foreground merges with the horizon line. You should avoid doing this kind of thing; either we see the horizon line clearly above, or the building distinctly cuts the horizon line. But overlaps like that greatly disrupt the reading :3
> I think you've placed your main subject, the shuttle, too far off-center. Bringing it a bit more towards the center (without centering it, just placing it less on the side), would be wiser in my opinion.
Otherwise, there are quite a few things that are well managed: you've added depth, we have two levels (I think you wanted to make 3 with the building in the foreground but it's too close in size to your shuttle for me to consider it really in front compared to it. You tell us a story and we understand what's happening, you managed well the levels of gray and the values of lines and we mainly look at your subject: the shuttle.
I attach an example of a possible correction. I think another angle might have been more striking too, but I stayed with yours, I just zoomed out a bit to make the image breathe more. And the perspective of the building in the foreground is all broken, so be indulgent ^^' By the way, I noticed that the sky was starry, did you choose intentionally to keep it clear then?
> la fameuse structure circulaire : je ne comprends pas de quoi il s'agit et par rapport Ă l'autre qu'on voit trÚÚÚÚÚs loin Ă l'horizon, elle semble plus fine. Ce n'est pas le mĂȘme objet. Et j'ai du mal Ă comprendre son volume.
Thank you for your feedback, which has made me aware of some issues with this drawing that I hadn't anticipated!
Firstly, regarding the points you mentioned:
> Circular structures: I tried to depict a sort of futuristic spaceship race, and the rings are reminiscent of slightly retro video games; they are the "points" that the spaceship has to pass through to follow the race path. Not necessarily easy to guess :/
> Foreground structure: I had in mind to depict stands, admittedly empty, with a kind of advertising banner hanging between two stands. A problem with grayscale levels to differentiate the various "benches"? Or a lack of detail?
> Gotcha on the graphical knot with the horizon line, thatâs a piece of advice I'll keep in mind! :3
> The sky is bright because I thought that darkening it might blur the grayscale levels on the other elements of the drawing, and that they would stand out better against a light background.
Then, to be completely honest, the spaceship was not supposed to crash but to take a turn in the circuit. That's what I hadn't anticipated: because the rings were not very clear (and probably the spaceship would have benefited from being a bit higher in the drawing), it changed the interpretation :s
Your zoom out does indeed look very nice, it's definitely more pleasant to look over!
You've designed by distancing from reality, but really well applied the principles discussed in class. Your composition is nice, it tells us a story, it's beautifully done, the values are well placed.
Honestly, hats off, it's really good work âïž
The only thing I would change are the clouds. For me, they are not necessary at all.
I'm happy with this drawing, I took my time and for once I didn't rush.
All these classes have boosted my morale because I was finally learning and understanding.
But lately I've started lessons on anatomy and that was a real shock; I donât know how to work with the human body, and I donât understand it. I realize that when I draw a human being, I only trust what I see.
Mais derniĂšrement j'ai commencer les cours sur l'anatomie et alors lĂ âŠ.grosse claque, je ne sais pas comment travailler le corps humain, et je ne le comprends pas. Je me rends bien compte que lorsque je dessine un ĂȘtre humain, je ne fait confiance qu'Ă ce que je vois.
Yes, the human body is a big deal. Living beings in general, actually.
It's good to understand what happens under the skin and the general structure for that, and therefore to delve into anatomy. I have no doubt that you can achieve it, but some training could be beneficial, I think :)
It's very pretty and poetic. There is a nice depth, it tells us a beautiful story, it's really touching.
However, I have some suggestions to improve your drawing in terms of composition.
> The tree branch is pretty and adds a poetic note, it's important, but misplaced in the sense that it encroaches on your subject: the stork watching its other half leave. I would move it to the left and lift it up to clear some space around the stork.
> The distant stork I would have done with its wings in a different position. Here it forms a T, which makes its pose very stiff, which is a pity.
> I would have shifted the sun a little to the left so as not to have it right over the second stork and to rebalance the image a bit.
I've made a quick preview below. Otherwise, it's really great, well done to you, it's a nice conclusion to the training ^^
However, I wonder if we can allow ourselves to use the hatching technique with other filling effects (I'm thinking particularly of clouds) on the same drawing.
Again, sorry for the lack of originality in the subject presented here.
Par contre je me demande si on peut se permettre sur le mĂȘme dessin dâutiliser la technique des hachures avec dâautre effet de remplissage ( je pense notamment aux nuages) .
And what to say: Wow! OMG, the composition, the atmosphere, the grayscale values are impeccable >///<
The rendering is great, you can see it with the thumbnail, it works VERY WELL. Special mention for the grayscale values which are very well managed. There's such an atmosphere in your drawing, it's crazy. I love it â„
Bravo! I can't wait to see what you can do with a topic you choose by yourself :D
Thank you for the encouragement, it is comforting and restores some confidence...
I will not immediately start a new topic but continue with the next steps of the course.
I will come back to this topic later to try my hand at a personal illustration.
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 3
13/10/2019
Here's my first drawing! đ
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
RĂ©mi
Voici mon premier dessin! đ
Une critique m'aiderait beaucoup.
RĂ©mi
Want to learn drawing?
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
13/10/2019
Well, I am very pleasantly surprised :D
The composition is cool, your elements are well constructed, it tells a little story too. You've even placed your elements according to different vanishing points and it works very well.
Where you could improve things is in terms of the gray values.
If we look at your image from a distance, everything is a bit uniform. You don't really have plans that stand out. If I were you, I'd try darkening the background building and a bit the tops of the tanks on the right.
I'm attaching a little preview below ^^
Otherwise, it's very nice, well done! :D
Eh bien je suis trÚs agréablement surpris :D
La compo est cool, tes Ă©lĂ©ments sont bien construits, ça raconte une petite histoire en plus. Tu as mĂȘme placĂ© tes Ă©lĂ©ments selon des points de fuite diffĂ©rents et ça fonctionne trĂšs bien.
LĂ oĂč tu pourrais amĂ©liorer les choses, c'est au niveau des valeurs de gris.
Si on regarde ton image de loin, tout est un peu uniforme. Tu n'as pas réellement de plans qui se détachent. Si j'étais toi, je testerais en assombrissant le bùtiment du fond et un peu le haut des citernes à droite.
Je te joins un petit aperçu en-dessous ^^
Autrement, c'est trĂšs chouette, bravo ! :D
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 3
14/10/2019
I had made a scale of values, but it's hard to stick to it.
I will do better next time!
Je m'Ă©tait fait une echelle de valeur, mais c'est dur de s'y tenir.
Je ferai mieux pour les prochains!
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 34
19/10/2019
Here's my little illustration.
I like my composition even though I think it's full of mistakes! đ
I'm open to any criticism because I really want to improve!
A big thank you for these well-structured courses, they have helped me think more when I draw.
I think I've learned more in a few weeks than in all these years of drawing!
Voici ma petite illustration.
J'aime bien ma composition mĂȘme si je pense que c'est bourrĂ© d'erreur ! đ
Je suis ouvert à toute critique car je compte bien m'améliorer !
Un grand merci pour ces cours bien structuré, ça m'a permis de mieux réfléchir lorsque je dessine.
Je pense avoir plus appris en quelque semaine que de toute ces années de dessins !
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
20/10/2019
Honestly, it works well :D You have made good use of the different concepts we covered in class.
My only slight criticism would be regarding the clouds which are all of similar size and very close to the horizon. It kind of stifles your composition :)
Your characters might be a tad too large, but it's not jarring ^^
It's good work, well done! :D
HonnĂȘtement ça fonctionne bien :D Tu as bien utilisĂ© les diffĂ©rentes notions vues en cours.
Mon seul bémol serait concernant les nuages qui sont tous de taille similaire et trÚs proche de l'horizon. Ca étouffe un peu ta compo :)
Tes personnages sont peut-ĂȘtre un poil grands, mais ce n'est pas choquant ^^
C'est du bon boulot, bravo ! :D
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 34
20/10/2019
Thank you for the positive response! I'm looking forward to seeing the character classes to better stage them.
It's true that I didn't think enough about the clouds. I just thought about the guidelines rather than their place in the image.
But having managed to use the concepts seen in the course allows me to appreciate my illustration even though it's still far from the result I really want.
Merci pour la réponse positive ! J'ai hùte de voir les cours de personnage pour mieux les mettre en scÚne.
C'est vrais que pour les nuages je ne me suis posé assez de questions. J'ai juste pensé aux lignes directrices qu'à leur place sur l'image.
Mais d'avoir rĂ©ussis Ă utiliser les notions vu en cours me permet d'apprĂ©cier mon illustration mĂȘme si c'est encore loin du rĂ©sultat que je souhaite vraiment.
Try our courses for free
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 2
Nombre de réponse(s) : 6
03/11/2019
Here's my illustration, trying to follow the advice given in the courses so far.
I feel like I still have a lot of progress to make, but I already feel like my drawings have improved a lot since I started taking your courses.
I would really appreciate your critical feedback, it would help me a lot đ
Voilà mon illustration, en essayant de suivre les conseils prodigué dans les cours jusque-là .
Je sens que j'ai encore beaucoup de progrÚs à faire, mais j'ai déjà l'impression que mes dessins se sont bien amélioré depuis que je suis vos cours.
J'aimerai beaucoup avoir votre retour critique, cela m'aiderait beaucoup đ
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
05/11/2019
So, I have a lot of things to say :D
There are good things, and others that we could improve.
You chose a sci-fi theme, and you tell us a little story, that's cool.
I clearly understood that a shuttle was crashing, even though I don't understand on what. Some kind of circular structure, we see another one in the background. And I clearly see the shuttle first, I think that's where you wanted to direct my gaze. You handled the levels of gray and the values of the lines well.
Things we can improve:
> the famous circular structure: I don't understand what it is and compared to the other one we see very far on the horizon, it seems thinner. It's not the same object. And I have a hard time understanding its volume.
> The foreground: It feels like it's the top of a store? I'm not sure. In any case, it takes up as much space in your image as your crashing spaceship. It's a pity because it doesn't contribute anything to your illustration. If it were more offset to one side, it would be more striking and your image would breathe more.
> You have a graphical knot in your image, which tends to attract attention and disrupt the reading: the upper edge of the building in the foreground merges with the horizon line. You should avoid doing this kind of thing; either we see the horizon line clearly above, or the building distinctly cuts the horizon line. But overlaps like that greatly disrupt the reading :3
> I think you've placed your main subject, the shuttle, too far off-center. Bringing it a bit more towards the center (without centering it, just placing it less on the side), would be wiser in my opinion.
Otherwise, there are quite a few things that are well managed: you've added depth, we have two levels (I think you wanted to make 3 with the building in the foreground but it's too close in size to your shuttle for me to consider it really in front compared to it. You tell us a story and we understand what's happening, you managed well the levels of gray and the values of lines and we mainly look at your subject: the shuttle.
I attach an example of a possible correction. I think another angle might have been more striking too, but I stayed with yours, I just zoomed out a bit to make the image breathe more. And the perspective of the building in the foreground is all broken, so be indulgent ^^' By the way, I noticed that the sky was starry, did you choose intentionally to keep it clear then?
Alors j'ai pleins de choses Ă dire :D
Il y a de bonnes choses, et d'autres qu'on pourrait améliorer.
Tu es parti sur un thĂšme SF, et tu nous racontes une petite histoire, c'est cool.
J'ai bien compris qu'une navette s'Ă©crasait, mĂȘme si je ne comprends pas sur quoi. Un genre de structure circulaire, on en voit une autre au fond. Et je vois bien la navette en premier, je pense que c'est lĂ que tu voulais diriger mon regard. Tu as bien gĂ©rĂ© les niveaux de gris et les valeurs de traits.
Dans les choses qu'on peut améliorer :
> la fameuse structure circulaire : je ne comprends pas de quoi il s'agit et par rapport Ă l'autre qu'on voit trÚÚÚÚÚs loin Ă l'horizon, elle semble plus fine. Ce n'est pas le mĂȘme objet. Et j'ai du mal Ă comprendre son volume.
> Le premier plan : j'ai l'impression que c'est le dessus d'un magasin ? Je ne suis pas sûr. En tout cas, il prend autant de place sur son image que ton vaisseau qui s'écrase. C'est dommage parce qu'il n'apporte rien à ton illustration. S'il était davantage décalé sur un bord, ce serait plus percutant et ton image respirerait davantage.
> Tu as un noeud graphique dans ton image, ce qui a tendance à attirer l'attention et perturber la lecture : le bord supérieur du bùtiment au premier plan est confondu avec la ligne d'horizon. Il faut éviter de faire ce genre de choses, soit on voit la ligne d'horizon franchement au-dessus, soit le bùtiment coupe franchement la ligne d'horizon. Mais les superpositions comme ça perturbent beaucoup la lecture :3
> Je pense que tu as trop excentré ton sujet principal : la navette. La ramener un petit plus vers le centre (sans la centrer, juste la mettre moins sur le cÎté), serait plus judicieux à mon sens.
Autrement il y a pas mal de choses qui sont bien gérées : tu as mis de la profondeur, on a deux plans (je pense que tu voulais en faire 3 avec le bùtiment au premier plan mais il est trop proche de la taille de ta navette pour que je le considÚre comme réellement en avant par rapport à elle. Tu nous racontes une histoire et on comprend ce qui se passe, tu as bien géré les niveaux de gris et les valeurs de traits et on regarde bien principalement ton sujet : la navette.
Je te joins un exemple de correction possible. Je pense qu'un autre angle de vue aurait pu ĂȘtre plus percutant aussi, mais je suis restĂ© sur le tien, j'ai juste un peu dĂ©zoomĂ© pour que l'image respire davantage. Et la perspective du bĂątiment au premier plan est toute cassĂ©e du coup, sois indulgent ^^' D'ailleurs, j'ai notĂ© que le ciel Ă©tait Ă©toilĂ©, tu as choisi volontairement de le laisser clair du coup ?
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 2
Nombre de réponse(s) : 6
07/11/2019
Thank you for your feedback, which has made me aware of some issues with this drawing that I hadn't anticipated!
Firstly, regarding the points you mentioned:
> Circular structures: I tried to depict a sort of futuristic spaceship race, and the rings are reminiscent of slightly retro video games; they are the "points" that the spaceship has to pass through to follow the race path. Not necessarily easy to guess :/
> Foreground structure: I had in mind to depict stands, admittedly empty, with a kind of advertising banner hanging between two stands. A problem with grayscale levels to differentiate the various "benches"? Or a lack of detail?
> Gotcha on the graphical knot with the horizon line, thatâs a piece of advice I'll keep in mind! :3
> The sky is bright because I thought that darkening it might blur the grayscale levels on the other elements of the drawing, and that they would stand out better against a light background.
Then, to be completely honest, the spaceship was not supposed to crash but to take a turn in the circuit. That's what I hadn't anticipated: because the rings were not very clear (and probably the spaceship would have benefited from being a bit higher in the drawing), it changed the interpretation :s
Your zoom out does indeed look very nice, it's definitely more pleasant to look over!
Thanks again for the constructive feedback ;)
Merci pour ton retour, qui me fait prendre conscience de quelques soucis sur ce dessin que je n'avais pas anticipés!
Déjà , pour les points que tu as relevés :
> Les structures circulaires : J'ai essayé de représenter une sorte de course de vaisseau futuriste, et les anneaux sont à l'image des jeux vidéos un peu rétro, ce sont les "points" dans lequel le vaisseau doit passer pour suivre le chemin de la course. Pas forcément facile à faire deviner :/
> La structure du premier plan : J'avais en tĂȘte de reprĂ©senter un gradin, certes vide, avec une sorte de bandeau publicitaire accrochĂ© entre deux gradins. Un problĂšme de niveaux de gris pour faire ressortir les diffĂ©rents "bancs"? Ou un manque de dĂ©tails?
> Gotcha pour le noeud graphique avec la ligne d'horizon, c'est un conseil que je vais garder en tĂȘte! :3
> Le ciel est clair, parce que je me suis dit que le noircir risquait de diluer mes niveaux de gris sur les autres éléments du dessin, et qu'ils ressortiraient mieux sur un fond clair.
AprĂšs, pour ne rien te cacher, le vaisseau n'Ă©tait pas sensĂ© s'Ă©craser, mais engager un virage dans le circuit. C'est ça que je n'avais pas anticipĂ© : parce que les anneaux n'Ă©taient pas trĂšs clair ( et probablement que le vaisseau aurait gagnĂ© Ă ĂȘtre un peu plus haut dans le dessin), ça a changĂ© l'interprĂ©tation :s
Ton dézoom a bien belle allure en tout cas, c'est effectivement plus agréable à survoler!
Encore merci pour le retour constructif ;)
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 2
Nombre de réponse(s) : 51
14/11/2019
Here is my illustration; I tried to apply the advice given in the courses.
Honestly, I'm quite pleased with the result, especially the perspective (even though there are certainly errors).
I would really appreciate some feedback, areas where I should improve, in short, any constructive criticism is welcome.
Have a good day everyone.
Voilà mon illustration, j'ai essayé de mettre en pratique les conseils donnés dans les cours.
HonnĂȘtement je suis assez contente du rendu, notamment en perspective (mĂȘme s'il y certainement des erreurs).
J'aimerais beaucoup avoir un retour, les points oĂč que je devrais amĂ©liorer, enfin toute critique constructive et la bien venue.
Bonne journée à tous.
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 2
Nombre de réponse(s) : 51
14/11/2019
Want to learn drawing?
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 2
Nombre de réponse(s) : 51
14/11/2019
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
20/11/2019
I really love what you've done â„
You've designed by distancing from reality, but really well applied the principles discussed in class. Your composition is nice, it tells us a story, it's beautifully done, the values are well placed.
Honestly, hats off, it's really good work âïž
The only thing I would change are the clouds. For me, they are not necessary at all.
Other than that, big congratulations! \o/
J'aime Ă©normĂ©ment ce que tu as fait â„
Tu as designé en t'éloignant du réel, mais en appliquant bien les principes vus en cours. Ta compo est chouette, ça nous raconte une histoire, c'est joliment fait, les valeurs sont bien posées.
Nan franchement chapeau, c'est du trĂšs bon travail âïž
La seule chose que je modifierai, ce sont les nuages. Pour moi ils ne sont pas nécessaires du tout.
A part ça gros bravo ! \o/
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 2
Nombre de réponse(s) : 51
21/11/2019
I'm happy with this drawing, I took my time and for once I didn't rush.
All these classes have boosted my morale because I was finally learning and understanding.
But lately I've started lessons on anatomy and that was a real shock; I donât know how to work with the human body, and I donât understand it. I realize that when I draw a human being, I only trust what I see.
Je suis contente de ce dessin, j'ai pris mon temps et pour une fois je ne me suis pas précipitée.
Tous ces cours m'ont remontée de le morale car j'apprenais et comprenais enfin.
Mais derniĂšrement j'ai commencer les cours sur l'anatomie et alors lĂ âŠ.grosse claque, je ne sais pas comment travailler le corps humain, et je ne le comprends pas. Je me rends bien compte que lorsque je dessine un ĂȘtre humain, je ne fait confiance qu'Ă ce que je vois.
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
01/12/2019
Yes, the human body is a big deal. Living beings in general, actually.
It's good to understand what happens under the skin and the general structure for that, and therefore to delve into anatomy. I have no doubt that you can achieve it, but some training could be beneficial, I think :)
Oui le corps humain c'est un gros morceau. Les ĂȘtres vivants en gĂ©nĂ©ral d'ailleurs.
C'est bien de comprendre comment ça se passe sous la peau et la structure gĂ©nĂ©rale pour ça, et donc de se pencher sur l'anatomie. Je ne doute pas que tu puisses y arriver, mais une formation pourrait ĂȘtre la bienvenue je pense :)
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 40
17/11/2019
I'm sending you my 1st drawing.
Thanks for your feedback
Je t'envoie mon 1er dessin.
Merci pour ton retour
Try our courses for free
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
20/11/2019
It's very pretty and poetic. There is a nice depth, it tells us a beautiful story, it's really touching.
However, I have some suggestions to improve your drawing in terms of composition.
> The tree branch is pretty and adds a poetic note, it's important, but misplaced in the sense that it encroaches on your subject: the stork watching its other half leave. I would move it to the left and lift it up to clear some space around the stork.
> The distant stork I would have done with its wings in a different position. Here it forms a T, which makes its pose very stiff, which is a pity.
> I would have shifted the sun a little to the left so as not to have it right over the second stork and to rebalance the image a bit.
I've made a quick preview below. Otherwise, it's really great, well done to you, it's a nice conclusion to the training ^^
C'est trÚs joli et poétique. On a une jolie profondeur, ça nous raconte une belle histoire, c'est vraiment touchant.
J'aurais néanmoins quelque suggestions pour améliorer ton dessin en terme de composition notamment.
> La branche d'arbre est jolie et apporte une note poĂ©tique, elle est importe, mais mal placĂ©e dans le sens oĂč elle empiĂšte sur ton sujet : la cigogne qui regarde partir sa moitiĂ©. Je la dĂ©placerais sur la gauche et je ma remonterai pour dĂ©gager un peu d'espace autour de la cigogne.
> La cigogne dans le lointain je l'aurais fait avec les ailes dans une autre position. Ici elle forme un T, ça fige beaucoup sa pose, c'est dommage.
> J'aurais décalé un peu le soleil vers la gauche pour ne pas l'avoir bien à l'aplomb de la seconde cigogne et rééquilibrer un peu l'image.
Je t'ai fait un aperçu rapide ci-dessous. Autrement c'est vraiment chouette, bravo à toi, c'est une jolie conclusion à la formation ^^
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 40
21/11/2019
I saw your gallery; your drawings are really great.
J'ai vu ta galerie; c'est super chouette tes dessins.
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
01/12/2019
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 28
17/11/2019
After 3 weeks of work, I have finalized the drawing for this course, but unfortunately, I did not find the inspiration for a personal creation.
Probably also the fear of getting stuck on an element while working on perspective having chosen a subject that was too complex or not yet approached.
Then, when I see how easily Grégoire sketches his sketches, I don't think I am yet capable of freely reproducing subjects in perspective without using vanishing points.
There is also Grégoire's technique for finding the midpoint of the roof's arrow, I think this type of situation would undoubtedly have blocked my realization.
So with a bit of embarrassment, I embarked on executing the subject presented by Grégoire to see if I could complete a drawing with its final detailing using contrasts and line values.
However, I wonder if we can allow ourselves to use the hatching technique with other filling effects (I'm thinking particularly of clouds) on the same drawing.
Again, sorry for the lack of originality in the subject presented here.
AprĂšs 3 semaines de travail jâai finalisĂ© le dessin pour ce cours, mais malheureusement je nâai pas eu lâinspiration pour une crĂ©ation personnelle.
La peur sans doute aussi de rester bloqué sur un élément dans le travail sur la perspective en ayant choisit un sujet trop complexe ou par encore abordé.
Ensuite lorsque je vois avec quelle facilitĂ© GrĂ©goire esquisse ses pochades , je pense pas encore ĂȘtre capable de reproduire Ă main levĂ© des sujets en perspective sans utiliser les points de fuites.
Il y a aussi la technique de Grégoire pour trouver le point médian de la flÚche de la toiture, je pense que ce type de situation aurait sans doute bloquer ma réalisation.
Donc avec un peu de gĂšne je me suis lancĂ© dans la rĂ©alisation du sujet prĂ©sentĂ© par GrĂ©goire afin de voir si jâarriverais Ă complĂ©ter un dessin avec sa mise au propre en utilisant les contrastes et les valeurs de trait.
Par contre je me demande si on peut se permettre sur le mĂȘme dessin dâutiliser la technique des hachures avec dâautre effet de remplissage ( je pense notamment aux nuages) .
Encore dĂ©solĂ© pour le manque dâoriginalitĂ© du sujet prĂ©sentĂ© ici
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
20/11/2019
It's not a problem to have stayed with Grégoire's example :) Originality will come later, it's good to secure your foundations to start :D
And what to say: Wow! OMG, the composition, the atmosphere, the grayscale values are impeccable >///<
The rendering is great, you can see it with the thumbnail, it works VERY WELL. Special mention for the grayscale values which are very well managed. There's such an atmosphere in your drawing, it's crazy. I love it â„
Bravo! I can't wait to see what you can do with a topic you choose by yourself :D
C'est pas un problĂšme d'ĂȘtre restĂ© sur l'exemple de GrĂ©goire :) L'originalitĂ© viendra aprĂšs, c'est bien d'assurer ses bases pour commencer :D
Et que dire : Whaouh ! Rholalala, la compo, l'ambiance, les valeurs de gris c'est impeccable >///<
Le rendu est top, ça se voit avec la miniature, ça fonctionne HYPER BIEN. Mention spĂ©ciale pour les valeurs de gris qui sont super bien gĂ©rĂ©es. Y a une de ces ambiances dans ton dessin, c'est dingue. J'adore â„
Bravo ! J'ai hĂąte de voir ce que tu es capable de faire avec un sujet que tu auras choisi par toi-mĂȘme :D
Want to learn drawing?
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 28
20/11/2019
I will not immediately start a new topic but continue with the next steps of the course.
I will come back to this topic later to try my hand at a personal illustration.
je vais pas me lancer de suite dans un nouveau sujet mais continuer les Ă©tapes suivantes du cours .
Je reviendra sur ce sujet plus tard pour m'essayer sur une illustration personnelle.
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 3
Nombre de réponse(s) : 2508
01/12/2019
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 0
Nombre de réponse(s) : 1
11/12/2019
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 81
31/12/2019
For personal creation, well, a little moment of solitude precedes...but that's exactly what is exciting...đđ
I'm going to post 4 A4s (my format, as I can't scan anything else), I'm not posting everything because YES, I used paper...
Thanks for your feedback
Pour la crĂ©ation personnelle, et bien un petit moment de solitude prĂ©cĂšde...mais c'est justement ce qui est passionnant...đđ
Je vais poster 4 A4 (mon format, car je ne sais rien scanner d'autre), je ne mets pas tout car OUI, j'ai usé du papier...
Merci de vos retour
Interactions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 81
31/12/2019
Try our courses for free
See our coursesInteractions
Nombre de sujet(s) : 1
Nombre de réponse(s) : 81
31/12/2019
You must be logged in to reply on the forum.